Thank you for visiting these web pages.
Your emails are welcome and will
always be promptly responded to.
Last updated 1st August 2005
Contact: Webmaster@Tribulations.freeservers.com
Re: G.T. v Gemstar, @
Tribunals since 2/7/03
INTRODUCTION :
"A mature, clear Legal System is one
of the foundations of a Democratic Society.
We all have a responsibility not to destroy the ground all of us stand on."
(UK Home Secretary: Evening Standard 12 May
2003).
Unfortunately, such perceptions of legal transparency are not always
upheld, where uncostitutional powers such as Corporate Prominance influence the Legal
System.
In this instance, the Applicant, who is a Self Litigant is faced with the Undue
Influences of her former employers which is a cost centre of a US Multi National Public/
listed company - that reputatly has a multi milion legal spent each year on law suits.
In this instance enhanced by the might of a top UK Solicitor firm, who also
act as Parliamentary Agents.
Constant wrong doings are faced in this case to date, in contrast to what the
law provides.
At this site you will be reading of realities pointed to arrogant misuse of
legal practices by UK Public Servants who in collusion and control by Corporate
Prominance abide to total abuse and disrespect of legal practices and justice.
Such arrogant missapplication of power through Public Servants in placing
reliance to the fraudulent use of the Courts processes to defraud Applicant with intent,
of substantial legal and "other" costs, as well as denial and abductions of all
rights, engaging a civil case to The Terrorist Act
2001.
The Judiciary are under a duty and obligation to adhere to the latter of their Judicial
Oaths (The Ethical Realms) and to Juris
Prudence (The Legal Realms). Failure to do so, is in
contempt and abuse of the law.
In this case, the judges who dealt with this case to present, have not only
taken leave from their Judicial Oaths and Juris Prudence, but applied blatant suppression,
leading to False/Illegal Processes & Instruments, with intent. The Applicant as a
result of the many abuses of the law and psychological warfare, and after two years have
elapsed, has been denied the right to attend a proper Hearing in total violation of
Article 6 and other articles under the ECoHR. Despite this, False/Illegal applications
remain intact to suppressive legal implementations, even though The
Terrorist Act 2001 is absolved.
The duties of the Judiciary are to provide "Natural
Justice" within the realms of the Court Service and not to Defeat
Justice as is evident in this case and further supported by precedent case law as in
Grimes case, where it clearly states that " it is a Common Law
offence to attempt to Defeat the course of Justice."
Misconduct in public office and particularly by the Judiciary, truly defeats the
purpose of Justice, as Justice is sacrificed by the persons entrusted to uphold these
sacred principles, and such obstruction of the law has a domino effect on the quality of
our Democratic systems.
What is a further malfeasance of Justice is that ignorance of
responsibility is pleaded or avoided, including the UK Minister for Constitutional Affairs
and Lord Chancellor, who appoints these Judges, as well as The Home office and DTI
Ministers. The Minister/Lord Chancellor has been advised of such wrong doings since
22 October 2004 and updated thereafter. Since 10th May 2005 The Attorney General has also
been requested to provide his legal guidance
to the judiciary as part of his job function which are still pending.
The Legal System to be truly independent and impartial, as the Law
provides, cannot be held to ransom by Corporate Prominance and such other unconstitutional
powers.
Placing this case in the public domain, under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1999 and
Article 10 ECoHR |
